quality Industrial Robot Arm & Welding Robot Arm factory

.gtr-container-x7y8z9 { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, "Times New Roman", Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6; padding: 15px; box-sizing: border-box; max-width: 100%; overflow-x: hidden; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 .gtr-title-main { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 20px; text-align: left; color: #0056b3; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 .gtr-title-section { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-align: left; color: #0056b3; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 p { font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-align: left !important; line-height: 1.6; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 .gtr-image-wrapper { margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 img { /* As per strict instruction: "禁止新增任何布局或尺寸样式", max-width: 100%; height: auto; are omitted. Images will display at their intrinsic size or size specified by HTML attributes, potentially overflowing on smaller mobile screens. */ } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 ul, .gtr-container-x7y8z9 ol { margin: 0; padding: 0; list-style: none !important; margin-bottom: 15px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 li { list-style: none !important; position: relative; padding-left: 25px; margin-bottom: 8px; font-size: 14px; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 ul li::before { content: "•" !important; color: #007bff; font-size: 1.2em; position: absolute !important; left: 0 !important; top: 0; line-height: 1.6; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 ol { counter-reset: list-item; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 ol li::before { /* As per strict instruction: "禁止写 counter-increment: none;", this will result in the ordered list displaying "1. 1. 1. ..." */ content: counter(list-item) "." !important; position: absolute !important; left: 0 !important; top: 0; width: 18px; text-align: right; margin-right: 5px; color: #007bff; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.6; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 .gtr-table-wrapper { overflow-x: auto; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse !important; border-spacing: 0 !important; margin: 0; font-size: 14px; min-width: 600px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 th, .gtr-container-x7y8z9 td { border: 1px solid #ccc !important; padding: 10px !important; text-align: left !important; vertical-align: top !important; word-break: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 th { font-weight: bold; background-color: #e9ecef; color: #333; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 tbody tr:nth-child(even) { background-color: #f9f9f9 !important; } @media (min-width: 768px) { .gtr-container-x7y8z9 { max-width: 960px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 20px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 .gtr-title-main { font-size: 24px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 .gtr-title-section { font-size: 20px; } .gtr-container-x7y8z9 table { min-width: auto; } } What Are Welding Cobots? In today's fast-evolving manufacturing landscape, welding cobots are transforming how we approach metal joining tasks. These collaborative welding robots, often simply called welding cobots, are designed to work alongside human operators without the need for strict separation. Unlike traditional welding robots that operate in isolated cells, cobots emphasize partnership, making them ideal for dynamic environments. This shift reflects broader market trends where welding robot automation is gaining traction, driven by demands for efficiency and safety in industries like automotive and fabrication. As collaborative welding robot systems become more accessible, they're helping businesses of all sizes streamline operations and boost productivity. How Welding Cobots Work: Core Technologies At the heart of a welding cobot's functionality lies a suite of advanced technologies that enable seamless human-robot interaction. These systems rely on sophisticated perception tools, such as force sensors that detect contact pressure, vision systems for precise positioning, and collision detection mechanisms to prevent accidents. This setup allows the cobot to "feel" its surroundings and adjust accordingly. Teaching a cobot to perform welding tasks is remarkably user-friendly. Operators can use hand-guided teaching, where they physically move the robot arm through the desired path, or opt for more traditional programming methods via intuitive software interfaces. This flexibility extends to various welding processes, including MIG, TIG, and spot welding, ensuring compatibility with diverse project needs. Integration is another key aspect: welding cobots connect smoothly with power sources and control systems from leading brands. What truly sets them apart, though, are their built-in safety features. Without requiring bulky safety fences, these robots operate at reduced speeds and with force limits, enabling safe collaboration in shared workspaces. Key Advantages of Welding Cobots Welding cobots offer a compelling array of benefits that address common pain points in welding operations. Here's a closer look at why they're becoming indispensable in automation welding scenarios. Easy to Program: Even welders without extensive robotics experience can get up to speed quickly. The intuitive interfaces mean less time on training and more on production, making cobot welding solutions perfect for teams transitioning to automation. Flexible Deployment: In environments with small-batch or custom welding jobs, these robots shine. Their mobility allows easy repositioning, adapting to changing workflows without major overhauls. Lower Cost Compared to Traditional Options: From initial investment to installation and ongoing training, welding cobots keep expenses down. This affordability opens doors for smaller shops to embrace robotic welding efficiency. Improved Welding Quality and Consistency: By minimizing human errors like fatigue or inconsistency, cobots deliver precise, repeatable welds every time, enhancing overall product quality. Enhanced Worker Safety: Taking over hazardous tasks reduces exposure to fumes, heat, and sparks, allowing humans to focus on oversight and creative problem-solving. These advantages make welding cobots a smart choice for businesses seeking reliable, efficient automation. Welding Cobots vs. Traditional Welding Robots When deciding between a welding cobot and a traditional welding robot, understanding the differences is crucial. Here's a side-by-side comparison to highlight why many are opting for cobots in today's market. Comparison Point Welding Cobot Traditional Welding Robot Programming Simple and intuitive, often hand-guided Requires professional engineers and complex coding Safety Human-robot collaboration without fences Needs large safety enclosures to isolate the robot Cost Generally lower upfront and operational expenses Higher due to equipment, setup, and maintenance Application Ideal for small batches and varied tasks Best for high-volume, repetitive production Flexibility High; easy to move and reconfigure Suited for fixed, dedicated setups This contrast underscores a key question: Why choose welding cobots? For operations valuing adaptability and cost-effectiveness over sheer volume, they're often the superior option in welding robot automation. Typical Applications of Welding Cobots Welding cobots are finding their place across a variety of settings, proving their versatility in industrial welding robot scenarios. In small metal fabrication shops, they handle intricate jobs that require precision without overwhelming the workspace. Automotive parts manufacturing benefits from their ability to weld components efficiently, supporting just-in-time production. For sheet metal and lightweight structural pieces, cobots excel in delivering clean, consistent results. Custom part processing is another sweet spot, where their flexibility accommodates unique designs. Even in educational and training centers, these automated welding systems serve as hands-on tools for teaching future welders. Perhaps most notably, they're aiding small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in their shift toward smart manufacturing, making cobot welding applications a gateway to broader automation. How to Choose the Right Welding Cobot Selecting the best welding cobot involves matching it to your specific needs. Start by considering the welding type—MIG for heavy-duty joins, TIG for finer work, or spot welding for quick assembly. Payload capacity and reach radius are critical; ensure the cobot can handle your materials and workspace layout. Compatibility with welding power sources from brands like Fronius, Lincoln, OTC, or Miller is essential for smooth integration. Prioritize user-friendly teaching methods, especially if your team lacks robotics expertise. Don't overlook post-purchase support: reliable maintenance, service, and spare parts availability can make or break long-term success. Finally, assess how well the cobot fits your production scale and tasks—whether it's high-mix low-volume or something more specialized—to maximize ROI in collaborative welding robot systems Future Trends of Welding Cobots Looking ahead, welding cobots are poised for exciting advancements that blend intelligence with practicality. AI-driven path optimization will refine welding routes in real-time, reducing material waste and time. Adaptive welding techniques, where the robot adjusts parameters on the fly based on material variations, promise even greater precision. Visual recognition and seam tracking will become standard, allowing cobots to follow welds autonomously with minimal setup. Integration with mobile platforms like AGVs or AMRs could create flexible welding cells that move around factories as needed. As these innovations unfold, expect wider adoption among SMEs, democratizing AI welding cobot technology and pushing smart welding robot solutions into mainstream use for intelligent robotic welding. Conclusion In summary, welding cobots represent a powerful fusion of technology and human ingenuity, delivering efficiency, safety, and quality in ways traditional systems can't match. Their rise as a mainstream choice in the metal processing industry stems from addressing real-world challenges like cost barriers and skill shortages. If you're exploring ways to elevate your operations, diving deeper into welding robot automation and collaborative welding robot systems could be the next step. Consider how these tools might fit your setup— the future of welding is collaborative, and it's here now.

Driven by the dual forces of the restructuring of global value chains and the advancement of the “Made in China 2025” strategy, the manufacturing sector is undergoing a profound transformation from rigid production to flexible manufacturing. According to McKinsey's 2024 Global Manufacturing Report, 83% of industrial companies have identified “flexible production capabilities” as a core KPI for digital transformation. In this context, collaborative robots (Collaborative Robot, Cobot) are emerging as a key solution to the challenges of “high-mix, low-volume” production, thanks to their unique interactive safety, deployment flexibility, and intelligent collaborative capabilities. This article will analyze how collaborative robots are reshaping modern production systems from three perspectives: technical architecture, system integration, and human-machine collaboration. I. Technical Evolution and System Positioning of Collaborative Robots 1.1 The Technical Essence of Safe Collaboration The safety of collaborative robots is based on four technical pillars: Dynamic Force Control System: Real-time monitoring of contact force via six-axis torque sensors. When abnormal contact exceeding 150N is detected, the system can trigger a safety shutdown within 8ms (compliant with ISO 13849 PLd standards) 3D Intelligent Perception: For example, Omron's FH series vision system combined with a ToF depth camera achieves obstacle detection accuracy of ±2mm within a 3m radius Bionic Mechanical Design: Utilizes lightweight carbon fiber frames (e.g., Universal Robots' UR20 weighs only 64 kg) and joint elastic drive technology Digital Safety Twin: Simulates human-machine interaction scenarios in a virtual environment; for example, Yaskawa Electric's MotoSim software can simulate 98% of physical collision risks 1.2 The Neural Endpoints of Manufacturing Systems In the Industry 4.0 architecture, collaborative robots play the terminal role in the “perception-decision-execution” closed-loop system: Data collection layer: Uploads over 200 dimensions of device status data, such as joint torque and motor current, via the EtherCAT bus at a frequency of 1 kHz Edge computing layer: Equipped with edge AI chips such as NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin, enabling local visual recognition (e.g., part defect detection with latency

“On the robot must be selected without teaching” ‘fully automated welding = the future of competitiveness’ - the anxiety of the manufacturing industry is being infinitely amplified by the marketing rhetoric. As a deep-rooted welding field for more than 20 years practitioners, I was saddened to see: 60% of the customers in the selection of the early stage of the “technology path dependence”, while ignoring the depth of their own process analysis. This article from the essence of the process, three steps to end the “pseudo-needs”, to find the optimal solution. Welding scene “three-dimensional positioning method”: first know yourself, and then choose the technology Dimension 1: process complexity - the starting point for determining “intelligence”. Simple scene (suitable for traditional teaching robots): ✅ Single type of weld (straight line/ring) ✅ Consistency > 95% (e.g. mass production of automotive exhaust pipes) ✅ ≤ 3 material types (carbon steel/stainless steel/aluminum alloy) ✅ Cost Warning: The payback period for such scenarios can be extended by 2-3 times with strong no-tutorials. Complex scenarios (no teaching value highlights): ✅ Multi-species and small batch (e.g. customized parts for construction machinery) ✅ Workpiece tolerance > ± 1.5mm (real-time correction) ✅ Dissimilar material welding (steel + copper, aluminum + titanium, etc.) ✅ Typical case: after the introduction of a no-demonstration program in an agricultural machinery enterprise, the commissioning time for production changeover was shortened from 8 hours to 15 minutes Dimension 2: production volume - to calculate the “automation” of the economic accounts Formula: Break-even point = equipment cost / (single piece of labor savings × annual output) When the production volume 20,000 pieces/year and the product life cycle is >3 years, the teaching-free solution is more cost-effective. Dimension 3: Environmental constraints - the “invisible threshold” of technology implementation Four major constraints that must be evaluated: ① Workshop dust/oil level (affecting vision system accuracy) ① Workshop dust/oil level (affects vision system accuracy) ② Grid fluctuation range (whether the equipment can work stably under ±15% voltage variation) ③ Spatial accessibility (pipelines/tight spaces require customized robotic arms) ③ Space accessibility (customized robotic arms for pipelines/narrow spaces) ④ Process certification requirements (automotive industry needs to comply with IATF 16949 process specifications) Process selection of the five “fatal misunderstanding”: to avoid 90% of the customer procurement pit Myth 1: “Fully automated = completely unmanned”. Reality: no teaching still need process experts to set quality rules, the blind pursuit of unmanned may lead to a spike in scrap rate Avoid the pit strategy: require suppliers to provide process parameters debugging interface, retain the key nodes of manual review rights Myth 2: “The more functions the software has, the smarter it is.” Truth: Functional redundancy will increase the complexity of operation, a customer purchased “all-in-one” equipment because the operator mistakenly touched the AI button, resulting in batch rework. Core principle: choose a system that supports modular subscription (e.g., purchase basic positioning functions first, then upgrade as needed). Myth 3: “Hardware parameters equal actual performance”. Key indicators disassembled: Repeat positioning accuracy ± 0.05mm ≠ welding trajectory accuracy (affected by torch deformation, heat input deformation) Maximum speed 2m/s ≠ effective welding speed (need to consider the acceleration and deceleration process energy stability) Suggestion: Use the actual workpiece to carry out zigzag trajectory welding, and test the consistency of the depth of fusion at the inflection point. Myth 4: “One-time investment to end the battle” Long-term cost list: Annual fee for software licenses (some vendors charge by number of robots) Process database update fee (new material adaptation requires the purchase of data packages) Four Steps to Scientific Decision Making: A Complete Map from Requirements to Landing Step 1: Digital modeling of the process Toolkit: ✅ 3D scans of welded seams (to assess trajectory complexity) ✅ Material heat input sensitivity analysis (to determine control accuracy requirements) ✅ Welding process evaluation report (to define certification criteria) Output: “Digital Portrait of Welding Process” (with 9 dimensions of scoring) Step 2: Technology Path AB Test Comparison of program design: Program A: high-precision demonstration teaching robot + expert process package Scheme B: Teach-free robot + adaptive algorithm Test metrics: ✅ First-piece pass rate ✅ Changeover time ✅ Consumables cost/meter welded seam Step 3: Supplier Capability Penetration Assessment Soul six-question checklist: ① Can you provide test weldments of the same material? (Rejected generic demo parts) ② Is the algorithm open to process weight adjustment? (Prevent “black box” decision-making) ① Can you provide test weldments of the same material (reject generic demo parts)? ④ Is the after-sales service response time less than 4 hours? ⑤ Does it support acceptance by third-party testing organizations? ⑤ Does it support acceptance by third-party testing organizations? ⑥ Is the sovereignty of data clearly attributed? (Prevent process data from being locked) Step 4: Small Scale Validation → Rapid Iteration 30-day validation plan template: Week 1: Basic function acceptance (positioning accuracy, arc stability) Week 2: Extreme working condition test (large angle climbing welding, strong electromagnetic interference) Week 3: Production beat challenge (continuous 8-hour full load operation) Week 4: Cost audit (consumable loss rate, gas consumption comparison) Conclusion    The end point of welding intelligence is to bring technology back to the essence of the process! When serving a new energy vehicle supplier, we decisively recommended that the robot be retained for the box weld (due to the high consistency of the workpieces), while the non-teaching program was adopted for the shaped joints of the impact beam. This “hybrid intelligence” strategy helped the customer save 41% of the initial investment. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

I. From CNC system to robot king: the ultimate philosophy of a technology maniac Start-up and core technology breakthrough (1956-1974) In 1956, Fujitsu engineer Kiyoemon Inaba led a team to establish FANUC (Fujitsu Automatic CNC). This engineer, known as the "Godfather of Japanese Robots", once made a bold statement: "The ultimate goal of the factory is not to turn on even a light." 1965: Launched Japan's first commercial CNC system FANUC 220, which increased the machining accuracy of machine tools to micron level and subverted the traditional mechanical control mode. 1972: Independent from Fujitsu, launched the first hydraulic drive industrial robot ROBOT-MODEL 1, specializing in automobile parts handling, and the operating efficiency is 5 times higher than that of manual labor. 1974: A breakthrough was developed in the development of a fully electric servo motor to replace the traditional hydraulic drive system, reducing energy consumption by 40%, and increasing accuracy to ±0.02 mm, laying the foundation for global robot motion control standards. The rise of the yellow empire (1980s) In 1982, FANUC changed the robot's paint to the iconic bright yellow, symbolizing efficiency and reliability. In the same year, the α series servo motor was launched, with a 50% reduction in size and a 30% increase in torque density, becoming the "heart" of 90% of industrial robots in the world. Industry comparison: During the same period, the average trouble-free time of European robots was 12,000 hours, while FANUC robots reached 80,000 hours (equivalent to 9 years of continuous work), with a failure rate of only 0.008 times/year. II. The global product matrix: How the four trump cards dominate the industry 1. M series: the steel giant arm of heavy industry M-2000iA/2300: The world's strongest load-bearing robot, which can accurately grasp 2.3 tons of objects (equivalent to a small truck) and is used for battery pack assembly at Tesla's Berlin factory. M-710iC/50: Automotive welding expert, 6-axis linkage speed is 15% faster than competitors, weld accuracy is 0.05 mm, and Volkswagen production lines use more than 5,000 units. 2. LR Mate series: precision-made "embroidery hands" LR Mate 200iD: The world's lightest 6-axis robot (weight 26kg), repeated positioning accuracy ±0.01 mm, iPhone camera module assembly yield rate of 99.999%. Application case: Foxconn's Shenzhen factory deploys 3,000 LR Mates, each completing 24,000 precision plug-ins per day, reducing labor costs by 70%. 3. CR Series: The Power Revolution of Collaborative Robots CR-35iA: The world's first 35kg large-load collaborative robot, the tactile sensor can sense 0.1 Newton resistance (equivalent to the pressure of a feather), and the emergency braking time is only 0.2 seconds. Scenario breakthrough: Honda factory uses it to transport engine cylinders, workers and robots share 2m² space, and the accident rate is zero. 4. SCARA Series: The Secret of the Speed ​​King SR-12iA: A planar joint robot that completes the chip pick-and-place cycle in 0.29 seconds, 20 times faster than human operation. The daily output of Intel's chip packaging line exceeds 1 million pieces. III. Global layout: "Unmanned Iron Curtain" from Yamanashi, Japan to Chongqing, China 1. Global factory construction strategy Michigan, USA (1982): Serving General Motors, achieving 95% automation rate of welding lines, reducing the production cost of a single vehicle by $300. Shanghai, China (2002): Production capacity reaches 110,000 units in 2022, accounting for 23% of China's industrial robot market. After BYD's battery production line adopts FANUC robots, the battery cell assembly speed is increased to 0.8 seconds per unit. 2. "Dark Factory" Myth: Robots Make Robots The headquarters factory in Yamanashi, Japan has achieved: 720 hours of unmanned production: 1,000 FANUC robots independently complete the entire process from parts processing to whole machine testing. Zero inventory management: Through real-time scheduling through the FIELD system, the material turnover time is compressed from 7 days to 2 hours. Extreme energy efficiency: Each robot consumes only 32kWh of energy per production, which is 65% lower than traditional factories. Industry comparison: The average output value per capita of similar factories in Germany is €250,000/year, while the average output value per capita of FANUC's dark factory is €4.2 million/year. IV. Intelligent future: 5G+AI reconstructs manufacturing rules 1. FIELD ecosystem: the "super brain" of the industrial Internet of Things Real-time optimization: connecting robots, machine tools, and AGVs, a gearbox factory compressed the tool change time from 43 seconds to 9 seconds through FIELD. Predictive maintenance: AI analyzes 100,000 sets of motor vibration data, with a fault warning accuracy of 99.3%, reducing downtime losses by $1.8 million/year. 2. 5G+machine vision revolution Defect detection: A robot equipped with a 5G module can identify 0.005mm scratches through a 20-megapixel camera, which is 50 times faster than in the 4G era. AR remote operation and maintenance: Engineers wear HoloLens to guide Brazilian factories in maintenance, and the response time is shortened from 72 hours to 20 minutes. 3. Zero-carbon strategy: the ambition of green robots Energy regeneration technology: The robot recycles electricity when braking, saving 4,000 kWh per unit per year, and Tesla's Shanghai factory saves $520,000 in electricity bills per year. Hydrogen power experiment: The M-1000iA driven by hydrogen fuel cells will be put into trial operation in 2023, with zero carbon emissions. Conclusion: The survival rules behind extreme efficiency FANUC builds a moat with "technological closure" (self-developed servo motors, reducers, and controllers), and uses "unmanned production" to reduce costs to 60% of its competitors. Its global gross profit margin of 53% (far exceeding ABB's 35%) confirms Seiuemon Inaba's famous saying: "Efficiency is the only currency in the industrial world."

Deviations in the position and shape of the workpiece cause the robot's taught welding trajectory to be “corrected”. KUKA's Touch Sensor package corrects these deviations before welding, and when the workpiece deviates from the original path, it is located by means of a wire or other sensors, and the original trajectory is compensated for in the program. I. Detection Principle The KUKA robot with Touch Sensor detects the correct weld position of the workpiece by contacting the workpiece with a welding wire and forming a current loop within a predetermined distance, as shown in the diagram below. KUKA's absolute position encoders memorize the position (x/y/z) and angle (A/B/C) of the welding torch in space in real time. When the robot touches the electrically charged wire to the workpiece according to the set program, a loop is formed between the wire and the workpiece, and the control system compares the current actual position with the position parameters from the teach-in. The new welding trajectory is corrected by combining the current data with the demonstration trajectory, and data correction is performed to correct the welding trajectory. The use of the contact sensor position-finding function can determine the deviation between the actual position of the component or part on the workpiece and the programmed position, and the corresponding welding trajectory can be corrected. The position of the starting point of the weld can be determined by contact sensing at one to three points; the number of points required to correct a deviation in the overall position of the workpiece depends on the shape of the workpiece or the position of the weld seam. This position finding function can be used to correct any number of individual points, a section of the weld program, or the entire weld program, with a measurement accuracy of ≤ ± 0.5 mm, as shown in the figure below. Second, the way to use 1. Software Installation TouchSensor welding position finding software package is usually used in conjunction with other KUKA welding software packages, such as ArcTech Basic, ArcTech Advanced, SeamTech Tracking and so on. Before installing the software package, it is recommended to back up the robot system to prevent system crashes, the need for KUKA robots dedicated system backup restore USB flash drive can be the background reply to the KUKA USB flash drive to get, the installation of the software package refer to the “KUKA Robotics Software Options Packages Installation Methods and Precautions”. 2. Command creation 1) Open the program->Commands->Touchsense->search, insert the search command. 2) Set seek parameter->Teach seek start point and seek direction->Cmd OK to complete the seek command. 3) Commands->Touchsense->correction->Cmd ok, insert offset command 4) Commands->Touchsense->correction off->Cmd ok, insert offset end command 3. Operating steps The calibration of the workpiece must be carried out prior to the execution of automatic positioning. 1) Set up the coordinate system for position finding. 2) Place the workpiece in a suitable position, and do not move the workpiece during the calibration process. 3) Create the position finding program 4) Create the trajectory path program 5) Select the search table to be used, and choose the appropriate search pattern according to the specific needs. Set the search mode to 'master' calibration. For example. 6) Execute the program between SearchSetTab and SearchTouchEnd. 7) Set search mode to 'corr' in search SetTab. For example. 8) The workpiece can now be moved and the correctness of the path verified. For safety reasons, it is best to run in T1 mode. Application examples (1) Simple search Simple search Need to search twice in different directions to find the actual position of the object on a position. The first search only defines the position information in one search direction (e.g. x), the second search defines the position information in other directions (e.g. y), and the starting position of the second search defines the remaining position information (e.g. z, a, b, c). (2)Circle Search Three searches in two different directions are required to determine the center of a circle in space. (3) One-dimensional translation CORR-1D Search (4) Two-dimensional translation CORR-2D Search (5) 3D Panning CORR-3D Search (6) One-dimensional rotation Rot-1D Search (7) Rot-2D Search (8) Rot-3D Search (9) Bevel V-Groove Search Two searches in opposite directions are required to determine the midpoint of the joint between two positions (X, Y, Z, A, B, C). (10) Single Plane Plane Search (11) Intersection Plane Search